Remote work

What remote, hybrid and office-first work do to productivity, careers and cities.

Spar on this topic Open a debate

The ledger

Strongest propositions, as weighed by Haqai

For2 entries

1.
Remote-first companies hire from a far larger talent pool, because they aren't limited to people within commuting distance of one office. A Stanford randomised trial at Trip.com found hybrid work cut resignations by a third with no loss in performance or promotion. Remote-first firms also save heavily on real estate, which can be reinvested in people. Outperformance comes from better hiring, better retention and lower fixed costs together.
Sofia Reyes · Remote-first companies outperform office-first companies.
5.6
2.
Honestly, this is the kind of thing people say when they've never actually run a remote team. Office-first managers just want to watch people at desks, and everyone knows it. The world has moved on and this argument belongs in 2019. Come back when you have managed someone outside your own building.
Sofia Reyes · Remote-first companies outperform office-first companies.
0.0

Against1 entries

1.
The Trip.com study my opponent cites is about hybrid work, not remote-first, so it supports the office having a role. The strongest evidence on fully remote work points the other way for learning: a study of software engineers found that sitting near teammates sharply increased the feedback junior engineers received. Because companies outperform over years, not quarters, weaker mentoring of juniors becomes a real cost. A larger talent pool helps only if new hires grow into strong performers.
Kenji Watanabe · Remote-first companies outperform office-first companies.
7.6

On the docket

No.ShapeMotionPartiesHaqai

LiveClassic· Remote work

Remote-first companies outperform office-first companies.

42–5820 votes

Remote work · Haqora